Please carefully read the following before you continue to the Consent Form.
You can download a PDF version of this Plain Language Statement to keep by clicking here.
School of BioSciences, University of Melbourne
Project
Identifying and Rating Quality of Reasoning
Responsible and Primary Researcher
Associate Professor Tim van Gelder (School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne)
Additional Researchers
Ashley Barnett and Tamar Primoratz (School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne)
Introduction
Thank you for your interest in this research project. The following two pages will provide you with further information about the project, so that you can decide if you would like to take part in this research.
Your participation is voluntary. If you don’t wish to take part, you don’t have to. If you begin participating, you can also stop at any time. Please ask questions about anything that is unclear.
What is this research about?
Our research team is investigating how people identify and evaluate quality of reasoning. Specifically, we want to understand and compare how different kinds of rating instruments and methods can be applied to evaluating quality of reasoning in written products.
What will I be asked to do?
If you agree to participate, you will be asked to complete a training course and an online survey about demographics. Following the training, you will be presented with a variety of written products to evaluate. Finally, after completing the rating exercise, you will be asked to participate in an online survey to provide feedback on your experience. We estimate the total time commitment will range from four to eight hours and it can be done at your own pace.
What are the possible benefits?
Findings from this research will contribute to our understanding of how people recognise and evaluate reasoning in a variety of written forms.
What are the possible risks?
We don’t anticipate any risks from participation in this study. However, if you have any questions, please contact the researchers.
Do I have to take part?
Your decision to participate is voluntary – if you don’t wish to take part, you don’t have to. If you begin participating, you can also stop at any time. If you do wish to stop participating, we will be unable to destroy the data you have already contributed. The nature of the system makes the task of disentangling your data from the overall analysis impossible.
What will happen to information about me?
Information you provide will be safeguarded subject to legal requirements. Your data will be password protected and accessible only by the named researchers. Only de-identified data will be shared with other researchers and the community. The data from this research will be stored at the University of Melbourne for at least 5 years.
Who is funding this project?
This project is funded by the US Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity, which is an organization within the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence. The grant is administered under the CREATE Program. It is part of a large project: the SWARM project at The University of Melbourne (see www.swarmproject.info).
Where can I get further information?
If you would like more information about the project, please contact:
Who can I contact if I have any concerns about the project?
This research project has been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of The University of Melbourne. If you have any concerns or complaints about the conduct of this research project, which you do not wish to discuss with the research team, you should contact the Manager, Human Research Ethics, Research Ethics and Integrity, University of Melbourne, VIC 3010.
All complaints will be treated confidentially. In any correspondence please provide the name of the research team or the name or ethics ID number (1646872) of the research project.
⟵ Back
Consent Form
Please carefully read the following and indicate your consent (or otherwise) using the buttons at the bottom of the page.
You can download a PDF version of this Consent Form to keep by clicking here.
Project
Identifying and Rating Quality of Reasoning
Responsible and Primary Researcher
Associate Professor Tim van Gelder (School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne)
Additional Researchers
Ashley Barnett and Tamar Primoratz (School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne)
If you would like to take part in the study, please indicate your agreement with the following statements:
I consent to participate in this project, the details of which have been explained to me, and I have been provided with a written plain language statement to keep.
I understand that the purpose of this research is to investigate how people recognize and rate quality of reasoning in written products.
I understand that my participation in this project is for research purposes only.
I acknowledge that the possible effects of participating in this research project have been explained to my satisfaction.
In this project I may be asked to
complete surveys that seek non-identifiable demographic information and feedback about my experience in the study
evaluate the quality of reasoning within a variety of written products
use a variety of methods and instruments to evaluate quality of reasoning in written products
I understand that my responses will be recorded and stored separately from identifying information.
I understand that non-identifiable quotes from written contributions I make during the project may be included in reports and publications.
I understand that my participation is voluntary and that I am free to withdraw from this project anytime without explanation
I understand that the data from this research will be stored on the Open Science Framework (OSF), an online research database that specialises in secure storage of de-identified research material. I have been informed that the confidentiality of the information I provide will be safeguarded subject to any legal requirements; my data will be password protected and accessible only by the named researchers.
I understand that by answering yes to this question I am signifying my consent to participate as outlined above.
Do you consent to participating in this study?
⟵ Back
You have opted-out
You have opted-out of the Evaluating Analytic Reasoning in Intelligence Products training. We thank you for taking the time to consider participating.
Changed your mind?
That’s okay! To return to the Consent Form, click here.
Help spread the word
If you happen to know someone else who might want to participate, we’d be grateful if you could let them know about this opportunity.
If you have any questions or concerns, please don’t hesitate to contact us at hunt-lab@unimelb.edu.au.
Kind regards,
Associate Professor Tim van Gelder, on behalf of the SWARM Project
Director, The Hunt Laboratory for Intelligence Research
School of Biosciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville Campus
Melbourne VIC 3010
Welcome to the Evaluating Analytic Reasoning training and study! We hope you find this a valuable and rewarding experience.
Next Steps
The training on how to apply the methodology will take place on the SWARM Learning Center.
Click the button below to be directed to the training signup page.
Click ‘ENROLL FOR FREE’.
Enter your details & a password, click ‘SIGN UP’.
After completing the initial training, you’ll be directed to the analytic test products. The products will measure your ability to distinguish between good and bad reasoning, and your proficiency with the method you have been trained in.
You can work through this material at your own pace, but we ask that you complete the training within 30 days to ensure that you receive feedback and a Certificate of Completion at the end.
Help spread the word
If you happen to know someone else who might also want to participate, we’d be grateful if you could let them know about this opportunity.